Page 44 - 7. FINAL draft Compendium 2019 2020_22072022
P. 44

PATIENT CONCERNS INVENTORY HEAD & NECK AS AN INDIVIDUALISED APPROACH TO
            ASSESS POST-TREATMENT OUTCOMES AMONG ORAL CANCER PATIENTS IN MALAYSIA
            NMRR-18-3624-45010

            Ainon NA, Jennifer GD, Siti Mazlipah I, Ma BC, Marzuki ZA, Cri Saiful JMB, Nurshaline PK, Lee CW

            Introduction: Oral cancer and its treatment undisputedly impacts patients’ quality of life,
            posing a challenge to clinicians in managing them optimally. Identifying patients’ concerns
            is central to holistic patient care; as such time constraints faced by  clinicians during
            consultation sessions may pose a barrier in identifying such concerns effectively. The use
            of  Patients Concerns Inventory [PCI]-Head &  Neck  during post-treatment oral  cancer
            consultation sessions has previously shown to be beneficial, simultaneously promoting
            effective patient- clinician communication during consultations. Objectives: This study
            aimed to determine the feasibility of the PCI-H&N in assessing post-treatment oral cancer
            patients concerns and its relationship with patients’ HRQoL, psychological distress and
            satisfaction during their follow-up consultation. Materials and Methods: A mixed mode
            study  design  was  conducted  among  post-treatment  oral  cancer  patients  in  multiple
            centres of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics in Malaysia, in two phases; i) Phase I: 3-armed
            pragmatic RCT among post-treatment oral cancer patients, and ii) Phase II: focus group
            discussion among health personal. A sample of 123 post-treatment oral cancer patients
            attending their follow-up reviews were recruited comprising Malaysians aged 18 years
            and above, completed treatment and on follow-up from one month until five years or
            more. A set  of self-administered questionnaires  was administered pre  and post-
            consultation.  The primary outcomes  were patients’ HRQoL assessed by the  FACT-
            H&Nv4.0, psychological distress by using Distress Thermometer and satisfaction with the
            follow-up consultation measured by a study specific questionnaire. The feasibility and
            preferred  versions of PCI-H&N  were secondary outcomes  assessed with  specific
            questionnaires respectively. The data were analysed descriptively;  multiple linear
            regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine possible
            predictors of patients’ HRQoL and psychological distress. Results: Response rate was 88%
            with 63% patients completing the post-consultation questionnaires. The median (IQR)
            number of the PCI-H&N items selected was three (1-5.5) and 43.5% patients selected four
            or  more concerns. ‘Recurrence  or fear  of cancer  coming back’ (31.8%)  was most
            frequently selected. A shorter time was taken by patients to complete the paper version
            (4.0 + 3.7 mins; 95% CI: 3.87, 5.87) than the computerised web-based version (6.0 + 4.5
            mins; 95% CI: 5.55, 8.92). A high number of concerns was strongly significant among
            patients of  ‘one-month  to one-year post-treatment’ (n=84%) (p=0.001). Significant
            association existed between ‘time after treatment completed’ and concerns  of
            ‘chewing/eating’, ‘mouth  opening’, ‘swelling’, ‘weight’,’ ability  to perform’,  ‘cancer
            treatment’ and ‘supplement/ diet-related’. ‘Chewing/eating’ scored highly for predicting
            low HRQoL (p<  0.0001) followed by  ‘appearance’  and ‘ability to perform recreation
            activities’ (personal function domain). Patients at risk of psychological distress were 14
            times more likely to select ‘ability to perform recreation activities’ and 7 times more likely
            to select ‘feeling depressed’. No significant association was identified between patient’s
            satisfaction with the consultation and patients concerns.

                                                   22
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49