Page 65 - FINAL COMPENDIUM 2020-2021 27.2.2022
P. 65

QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENTS IN MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA PATIENTS – A SYSTEMATIC
            REVIEW
            NMRR-18-1206-39593

            Tan PG, Soh CL

            Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the quality of life of patients
            who sustained maxillofacial trauma and to assess the tools used to analyse quality of life
            and psychological changes in  maxillofacial trauma patients.  Materials  and methods:
            Utilising databases medline via pubmed, embase via ovid, google scholar, scielo and web
            of science; studies evaluating quality  of life and psychosocial wellbeing in  patients
            sustaining maxillofacial trauma prior to 2018 were analysed. Besides descriptive variables,
            evaluating tool and changes to quality of life scores were necessary for inclusion. Results:
            Out of 3439 articles from initial search, 31 were included for analysis. 41  validated
            questionnaires were employed for data collection, with 21 specifics to quality of life. Each
            study had a sample varying between 40 to 378 patients and between 1 and 7 different
            data collection times. Hospital anxiety and depression questionnaire was the most
            common tool utilised; with more dental specific questionnaires being more popular in
            recent years and suggesting a new direction in oral health related quality of life in these
            patients.  Discussion:  General consensus is that quality of life is negatively impacted
            following maxillofacial trauma;  with increased rates of  anxiety, depression and post-
            traumatic stress disorder seen in these patients. The absence of a validated questionnaire
            for this type of trauma suggests an area of future questionnaire development. An increase
            in popularity in  oral health related quality  of life tool utilisation suggests an
            acknowledgement of oral health importance following maxillofacial trauma. Weaknesses
            include a lack of differentiation between psychosocial studies and quality of life; with the
            subject intertwined in these studies. There is also a large heterogenicity in studies
            included with regards to fracture type, follow up, and treatment.

            Published in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 2020 Vol 32:2; 87-92

            Dr Soh Chen Loong
            Dr Tan Peh Ge
            Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
            Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan
            Kuantan, Pahang




















                                                   41
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70